911 and 77 (21)
Personal research on the internet provides a picture of what actually happened that doesn't make any sense when comparing it with the overall picture that the 'media' and government paints for us. There are enough inconsistencies, and you only really ever need just one solid one, to make any reasonable person be very suspicious. It is certainly not reasonable to simply accept the picture that the media and the government paints for us when we see glaring inconsistencies and our job is not to accept the false picture but to figure out the right one. How one does that is up to each one of us as private individuals but glossing over the inconsistencies and giving tacit approval to the official explanation is the very opposite of what any of us should do.
I don't propose to work through any of the details, those inconsistencies, after all, they are being pointed out by others sufficiently to enable anyone who wants to know the truth to discover that truth for themselves. Any interested person can discover for him or herself what I have discovered and more. Some things I have noticed have not, so far as I am aware, been mentioned by others but I still prefer to keep quiet about them because there is high value as feedback to the perpetrators in this information and I don't want to give them anything that might help them to perfect their techniques.
It makes no difference anyway. If I work through, explaining 5 or 6 or 50 or 60 it makes no difference. People either tune in because they want to know or they tune out because they don't want to know and the quality and quantity of evidence is neither here nor there. What if everyone took that attitude? Well, they don't and they never will - in fact few people are inclined to. So that just explains a little about my stance in the post 911 (and 77) false picture, concealed reality, that we now live in and will do for many years to come.
In my own case I have seen more than enough to realize that this was what is known as a black op, a black operation carried out by some intelligence or military or agency of that kind. I am not writing this to convert anyone. I am writing this solely to address others who have already realized that 9/11 was an inside job. London's 7/7 was a much the same thing but you don't have to accept that idea to appreciate this. You almost certainly cannot accept what I am about to relate here unless you have reached that stage in your quest for the truth that you know that 9/11 was an inside job. And if you haven't yet reached this stage by now and you are genuinely interested to know the truth then please do your own research on this first and just make a note of this article for future reference.
Many others are not fooled either and reach that same conclusion about the massacre being a black op.
Where I seem to be more unique or out on a limb about is my take on the reason for doing it.
So far I have just heard it said that this is a good excuse for tightening gun control. Well I dare say that is true but it is unlikely to be the reason behind it.
At least a couple of post 9/11 related murders have gone virtually unnoticed. The deaths have not been linked, as I link them, to the 9/11 perpetrators, yet, and I believe this massacre is most likely to be of a similar kind and committed by the same organisation.
I think I have already written in another article that Michael Zebuhr was killed and Dan Wallace was killed not simply because they were talking about 9/11 as an inside job but because they were gathering support.
I gave this a lot of thought, why were they targetted and why are some others not apparently targetted at all? It is a balancing act for the perpetrators behind this. What they always have to do is balance the reaction likely to be caused by their own actions against the outcome if things are left without them murdering anyone. Their goal is to stop the truth about 9/11 from being realized more widely - otherwise a tipping point will be reached. They do not want to do anything that backfires on them. So to kill someone like Alex Jones would more than likely backfire as thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of people would suddenly jump off the fence onto the 911 was an inside job side whereas left alone or at least not killed, it can seem as if there is no such thing as this agency that does the killing, after all he is continuing to exercise his right to freedom of speech and the fence sitters can continue perching uncomfortably on top of that fence.
The last thing this agency, this secret government in effect, wants to see is something along the lines of the Paris 1968 student riots. So now you can grasp why they kill students and young people so often - that puzzle must cross your mind at some point. Others are killed or otherwise silenced too but it is youth, especially students who present that threat. They have to be silenced early, effectively and completely. Threats aren't enough - like was issued to Dan Wallace.
That is the most likely reason for the Virginia Tech massacre. This agency wanted to stop a growing group that was 9/11 savvy before it became more influencial. In the absence of a better explanation this is what I choose to believe is the most likely one.
Michael Zebuhr was killed because he was excited by the realization that some kind of energy beam had been used - this too is strongly evidenced by the photographs to a degree that is just about impossible to reject on any reasonable basis - and he was beginning to form a student group around this idea.
Dan Wallace was killed because he defied his killer who had warned him to "stop talking about five years ago" and was showing similar signs of becoming a group leader in the cause for 911 truth.
There were 9/11 truthers at Virginia Tech, students who were listeners of Alex Jones, wore 911 T-shirts and that, in my own personal view, is what the massacre was all about.
Of course it will take a lot more than three apparently isolated such incidents before the penny drops but it is almost bound to happen that rather than the lid coming more tightly down on the 9/11 inside job secret to keep it concealed, as more incidents, murders, of individuals and groups, especially student groups, are reported, so a point will come when more people, an avalanche of people, start to re-think and forcefully question what is actually going on as opposed to simply accepting the official story, the media story, which at this point they will see for what it is, a lie, a big monstrous lie.
What can be learned from this? What is the right way to proceed?
In my view, and it is only personal views that can ever be considered, or amount to anything, in all of this, it is actually probably best not to form large noticeable groups but to do things more surrepticiously and quietly, not to be cowardly but simply so that any one of us talking about such things is far less likely to become a potential target to be murdered. Be aware that while you can be seen to be small fry, if you are attracting some support then you will become a target until you have sufficient support that killing you will backfire.
If the Paris 1968 phenomenon were to result - which I think it would, it would be inevitable if the truth were just allowed to spread like wildfire, then this is the point at which the concentration camps would become operational. This is the point when a kind of civil war or internal war would break out. Personally, at least on this point, I am somewhat in agreement with but not sympathetic towards the secret government, not the psychopathic murderers who do their dirty work. They want to prevent that, so do I. On that we can agree.
But unlike them I want the truth to come out, not wholesale so as to cause riots and the like, but steady and intelligently supplied truth. The answer, it seems to me, is to work on the small, individual scale, to become aware of what is going on as a result, not of attending some huge or even small public gathering, at least not in the USA or the UK, but by one's own individual efforts. Then share with just close family and friends in a private way. The result will be the same, won't it? Except that riotting on the streets won't happen. Maybe it will take longer. Maybe it won't even work. But at least it seems a more constructive solution and a more intelligent reaction.
I think the knowledge, the truth of 911 and these post 911 murders and massacres, can be spread that way. Whether the unbloody revolution that is required can also then happen is another thing, but didn't we see peaceful revolution take place in the USSR?
Students need to be informed at the outset of their realization how this works and how to act appropriately so that massacres like Virginia Tech need not be repeated, truth efforts need not be nipped in the bud and a growing number of people can be slowly and intelligently made aware of the truth about 9/11 and how the cover up is maintained. After all, these murdered individuals, their work, trying to bring out the truth, has been terminated. Isn't it better to stay alive and well and keep working but more cunningly? To think that we actually have freedom of speech was probably never true - if you say things that have no import then fine, say it, there is never any danger, but say something that has some import and that always carries a risk and not infrequently a high price.
A cowardly idea? Well regardless, which is better, to have a peaceful revolution or to have a bloodbath in a civil war that results in a new government with the same agencies still operating - I mean how, how do you actually get rid of them and stop them from re-grouping and re-gaining power? After all we did not prevent it all the while that we could have done so? So exactly how is an internal war going to result in a clean bill of health, for the USA, for the UK, for Europe? I don't see how it can happen. That said, neither can I see how it can happen peacefully. I think we are all locked into this as a result of decades of failure to be vigilant to what is happening inside our own countries so that we have allowed a kind of self destructive political/military tumour to develop that is now more or less running the show.
Toppling any modern government doesn't do anything to disempower these agencies. Changing a president or prime minister or the flavour of the government does nothing. So one thing is for sure, a pointless blood bath would be the result if people come the realize the truth of 9/11 and fail to react calmly and intelligently about it. We who are already across that border so to speak, and know the truth of 9/11 at least we are not fooled by the official or media explanation even if we don't know all we ought to know, need to hold the hands of newcomers. We need to explain that this is not something to go wild about, that it has to be handled cautiously and calmly and thoughtfully. That's if we are not all to end up in concentration camps.
It is not really about bravery or cowardice. It is about doing things the best way and not leaping into action only to fall into a trap.
I do not need any convincing about what all of this means - even the tip of the iceberg is more than enough to make me very alert to what is really happening in our world. These murders are just tips of the iceberg, it is cold, dark and a real killer too.
Paul E. Coughlin
SaneThinking.com
23rd April 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
