911 and 77 (21)
One thing that I have been wondering about regarding the London bus explosion of July 7th 2005 was how the diversion took place, was the road ahead blocked-off for a start and what made the driver turn right if it wasn't blocked. I now, but only now, know the answer. It certainly doesn't make any sense to divert traffic that is heading towards Kings Cross down this particular road, it is too far away and can only head in the wrong direction while there are other roads further along the route which could easily have been used instead if the reason for the diversion had genuinely been to divert traffic away from the Kings Cross station because of the events going on there.
A few months back I listened on the Alex Jones Radio show online to Daniel Obachiki's account of what he witnessed as a passenger on that bus that was diverted and shortly after exploded, but I found it very frustrating because the questions I wanted answered were not asked and Daniel didn't volunteer a great deal of information unprompted and so I have always wondered about this because while there are no doubts in my mind that this was part of an inside job, very similar to 9/11, I like to fill in the blanks too even though they are not necessary to form an accurate overall picture. So I wanted to know, for example, if the road ahead seemed to be closed or if traffic was still going down except for this particular vehicle, this bus. In the end I got an answer and more than I expected too.
From time to time I take a look at a list of web sites I have just in case something new is added or indeed to see if they are still there and so after a break of several weeks I checked Daniel's web site (www.the4thbomb.com)and was rewarded with the discovery that not only has he added some new content, for the first time in many weeks, but some of it at least is very interesting indeed.
For instance, just dealing with the diversion, Daniel now has a time-line, a side by side comparison, the official account, blank, with Daniel's eye-witness account which is very revealing. It turns out that the traffic was not being diverted and not only that but another bus is actually proceding along ahead, undiverted. Thus that paricular bus, just minutes away from exploding, had been singled out. The only reason it could have been singled out for diversion is that it was already known that there was something special about this bus. If this had not been part of the plan, then the bus would have been evacuated at this point but all was going to plan.
Alex, at the time of the this guest appearance said two particular things that, one I knew to be wrong and the other I didn't see how he could assume. One, he said that he didn't believe that the police were in on the crime and two, he thought that the plan had gone awry and the bomb had been meant to explode earlier, failed and therefore the diversion. To some extent we have to second guess what is actually happening and it is bound to happen that we get some of it wrong, Alex, me and just about anyone else who is exposing the 9/11 and 7/7 inside jobs and the broader reality that they signal to us all, what they really mean. This is a well-meant correction not a criticism, indeed, I admire and am grateful to Alex and other 9/11 Truthers and if it weren't for them then I would be silent and probably totally ignorant of all this, this nightmare thrust upon us all.
It is not possible for the abundant evidence that shows clearly firstly that this was not a few supposed or would-be terrorists that had any part in this and secondly that it must have been a grand inside job scheme, to be concealed from the police, neither at the lowest rank level nor at the highest rank level. So the police were in on this inside job, this crime, these murders, throughout it's perpetration, they have played an active part and are keeping quiet and actually feeding into the big lie of it all. No leakers, no whistle-blowers among them. Such police, police who collude with such evil crimes, I call criminals and I call all criminal police what they are, scum. Not all police officers are criminals and I only call the criminal ones and the ones that give their support to these criminal ones (because that makes them equally criminal) scum. If the day has already arrived when I must not be allowed to call criminal police officers scum then the situation is actually much worse than you might have feared. I suspect we have reached that state already and I must not call any police officer, criminal or not, scum. I actually think I am pushing my luck just insulting the criminal police officers and clearly stating that it is the criminal ones, a huge number of them, that I am describing accurately and correctly - there may come a point where I will be given an ultimatum, to be silent on the point or to be silenced. I do think we have reached that point.
On Alex's point about the bomb failing to go off. Okay, what made the driver turn right? Daniel does not say if anyone came over to the driver and spoke with him or if he saw any directions being given to him by the drivers of the two cars that had stopped in front, but it doesn't matter because it is dead obvious that the driver knew that he had to do a sequence of actions apparently of his own and solely his own accord. His decision, to turn right, to take a diversion, could have been given by a surrepticious signal perhaps, but those two cars drove away so the driver's next actions had to have been pre arranged.
Just concerning the bus driver, these are some of the questions I think any honest investigator would want answered. What made him turn right? Why did he pull up 80 metres short of the bus stop? Why did he open the exit doors? Why wouldn't he open the entry doors even though people were trying to get on the bus? If his objective was to stop in order to let people off but not to let them on then why? Why did he appear lost after just one junction diversion? There is only one answer that makes any sense, to me, which is that he had been pre-programmed, just like a Manchurian Candidate, to perform each of those actions. I wish Daniel had been more explicit, more detailed, but I have waited long enough to write this and the missing, or unstated evidence, doesn't matter too much anyway because what he has now revealed just recently shows that the whole thing was a prearranged set-up if that wasn't abundantly clear previously, as actually it was to me.
Let's just wrap up a few ideas. If the contention that Alex made is true, that something went wrong and so, because the bomb hadn't exploded where it was meant to, they diverted it, then the subsequent actions cannot be properly explained. No. The driver could not have followed a change in plan like that. He had been programmed to perform a very simple set of actions that could not have been allowed to have been compromised at all. The stopping of the bus by the two anonymous high power cars was probably the hypnotic trigger. Why hold him in place? Because they were still setting up the zone where the bus was to be exploded - that's my own guess. Why did he turn right and not go straight on like the previous bus did?
Because he had been hynotically trained what to do exactly and it was to take that turn once the two controlling cars moved away. Why did he stop just a short distance on? To let passengers get off - not that they were showing signs of wanting to get off but only, only, if they spontaneously chose to get off. How would he know to do that unless the plan was working exactly? Keeping the entry doors closed would also have been a pre programmed action. Why did the car drivers not approach and speak to the driver? Because a hynotically programmed person acts, not on normal discussion but, in this case especially, on pre programmed and exact action pre-planted hypnotically implanted instructions. There was no need to speak to him and it would have backfired to do so. In fact it would have been a clear instruction not to speak to him and very likely not to signal or gesture him in any way. The trigger action would have been easily compromised by so doing. He simply was programmed to wait until the cars drove off then to turn right.
He would have been in a hypnotic daze, more than likely, from the moment the two cars stopped in front. They made it two and in a certain way to avoid being confused with normal traffic happenings. A hypnotic trigger must be controllable. This is my explanation why it was two cars when one would have been enough. That, the hypnotic daze, is why he disappeared and walked away. Although he walked, supposedly, for a couple of miles before he went in to a hospital, the more likely scenario is that he would have been "de-briefed" having accomplished his tasks. Thus he was more likely to have been met at some point and taken to one side and from there into a private controlled session. I only surmise this because he is supposed to have spent an hour or two walking and only then to walk into a hospital. It doesn't make any sense. He probably spent that missing time being de-programmed again and then driven to the hospital to provide a story fact if indeed that part of the story is true, after all, there is nothing much a hospital would do for him. He would have seemed and been confused and received some reassurance but, more than that is doubtful.
If you think I am being cruel, that the driver suffered due to the explosion then just take a look at some video freezes shots and other pictures of the bus that show the top deck with passengers waiting calmly and patiently to make their way down the staircase - they were all nearer the spot where the blast took place but none of them seem any the worse for it. While studying such pictures ask yourself where are all the dead and injured on that top deck, on the floor? Then why doesn't any of these standing passengers seem to be concerned about them? They're not really there. The driver was in a daze alright, a hypnotic daze.
That by the way, explains to anyone who is puzzled about the way the driver was affected - he largely is totally unaware, consciously, of his role in this evil crime but will no doubt be suffering from the kind of interference in his life that such an assault must produce. This use of hypnosis, I think it is fair to say, is an assault.
This simple addition to Daniel's eye-witness account is probably the one thing he has done apart from being interviewed by Alex Jones, to safeguard his life or, at least, if that is not quite how it is, this latest addition can only increases his chances of survival. Had he announced his intention to produce it, at any time prior to publishing it, then I would not have been surprised to discover that he had been murdered or imprisoned on false evidence. To kill or otherwise silence or falsely imprison or psychiatricise him now would only draw attention to this important information and, indeed, give it even more credibility.
My own web site, SaneThinking.com has a section dedicated to the cause of truth about 9/11, 7/7 and related issues and I also write, it is mostly articles that I feature on my site but a stab at a blog to (but it's not really me), on other subjects too. If they have something in common it is their 'unacceptability', their bizarreness and unconventionality. I write for thinking people, people who already understand or have some grasp of the reality that most simply don't have a clue about.
Paul E. Coughlin
SaneThinking.com
26th April 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
