911 and 77 (21)
This is my blog for March 2007 - the first month of my blog at SaneThinking.com. The entries are mostly brief except for a couple at the beginning of March. Most of my content for the web site is in the free articles and the Categories listed show the kinds of topics that I write about. Here in the blog is more of a, errrm, web log or diary rather than the reposit for ALL my web site's content! Sunday 31st March 2007
The great thing about writing your own little programs to create a web site is that you can tweak it and tweak it until it sqeaks just the way you want.
That's pretty much the story about how I've spent the past few days - tweaking and tweaking.
This is of course a never ending process or it can be if you let it - the trick is to know when to stop.
The same goes for writing blog entries...
Busy, busy, busy with programming my web site system this past couple of days. It's all about expressing my inate perfectionist streak! And this morning, well the whole day really, I have been writing a new article and it's turned out to be a long one at about 3,000 words. I start it with a philosophical little play of sorts and then spend the rest discussing aspects that others seem to have overlooked. Here it is: The Message Is Mightier Than the Missile
This is a big moment for me, I just got a receipt for a blog carnival submission and here is the reply with the link so you can figure out how blogs work as a network. This has actually become my first link in that network. So I am rather pleased and it's nice to know that Courage is the topic.
Congrats on making the Carnival of Courage! Posting is now up. Here's the link. If you have trackback enabled at your site, I've submitted it, so you should get a prompt to approve it at your site. If not, please consider linking back to the Carnival at your blog so we can whip everyone into a courageous frenzy and support the growth of each other's blogs. Here is the carnival Thanks!
Blog categories, sections, subjects and words used to tell you what it is about.
Here is the text of my comment that I just sent to Carnival Blog. And now I have made it more public I have an obligation, I suppose, to actually count the number, so pardon me while I go count.
Okay, (about ten minutes later)... I did better than a count, I took a screen shot and here it is:
"A suggestion for you... You have almost no selections to choose from, okay 10 or 20 maybe. So... This is just a B R I L L I A N T idea for you... Let bloggers offer their own category if you don't have one that suits for them to pick. You can then add more as they pile in to the list!. And it is ''the more the better'' because a blogger might not know what subject to place their blog and you may not have the right one either. BUT one does exist in the language somewhere, believe me. This way you encourage a broadening and greater depth of thought and selection to people's ideas. But, hey, I better stop here or I'll have a blog article on my hands... That's done it, it's just gotta be my blog entry for today, Done and dusted."
Now, I have as usual a little problem with categorizing my own blog and web site so invite categories that would help people to know what my writing, my web pages, are all about. That's just for me but as a tool for all other bloggers it has just got to be a good thing, hasn't it, to establish and build on a rich category, subject, classification list.
My first venture into the world of Carnival Blogs has begun!
Two new articles I wrote over the past few days have been submitted to carnivals. One on "Courage" in which I write about 911 "Truthers" and their bravery and I talk about two young men who have died recently. One murdered, shot in the head and the other, I say, murdered too. This article is here Inspiring Courage
And my earlier submission is about "Alcohol" and my article can be found here Alcohol
I won't always announce newly published articles here in my blog as it is easy enough to click on 'Articles' and see for yourself whenever it suits you to check. But I'll mention that I have been adding a new one every few days or so recently, so why not take a look.
In the near future I plan to include the first paragraph too in this list of articles to give a taste of each one without having to load the whole article itself and it is easier, I think, to scan the list and take in that paragraph that laboriously check each article in turn looking for what you want to read.
This is somewhat of an experimental episode, trying to see what works best.
Blogging software.
What's best? Personally, I tried Wordpress, got it up and running and created a few pages and so on but when I tried to do something really simple I found that I was spending too much time trying to find out how to do it. I can't remember off hand just what that very simple task was but it was a very simple and everyday one that any Wordpress user will almost certainly be able to explain to me. But for me it triggered an appraisal of what I wanted to use as my web site tool, not just a blog, and I decided that, actually, a lot of the features that are no doubt very useful to others, were in fact probably going to be never used in my case, so why have all that encumberance?
On the other hand I often find that I want to do something really simple but the way to do it in a lot of software, programs, either is not included or is complicated by related matters. What that means is that I often prefer to write my own simply little programs from scratch and use these rather than fire up some well-known program or other.
That's how I produce my blog and is in fact how I produce this web site in it's totality.
This is actually much easier to automate and turn into an efficient system than it would be if I had stuck with Wordpress or some other blogging software.
For me it's fun too. On top of that if I have a bad internet connection session then I can abandon that kind of work and switch to offline tasks instead. Adjusting and tweaking my two main programs to produce this web site is something I can build on as the ideas occur to me.
What have I forgone, at least for now? PHP and server side database driven web pages. If I have to I will get around to using PHP but as for SQL server databases I don't see myself ever needing one. So when you see how simple my blog pages are this is part of the reason but as time goes by and I want to include say links or trackbacks then I will reappraise my needs and see if I can incorporate them without too much extra trouble.
But it is still early days in the blogosphere for me and I am still on a learning curve to some extent. One thing I can say to would-be bloggers is not to be put off by what seems to be necessary to create your own blog. You don't need to have ANY blogging software at all!
You can create web pages and bloggy web pages by hand using NotePad or similar. The first thing is to make a template and then all you need do is copy that every time you want a new page. It really is more fun to do the whole lot yourself and that way you have far more control over your blog.
Wordpress is fine if it is fine for you and I know it is perfect for a huge number of bloggers but if you are new to blogging don't think that you actually need any blogging software at all because you don't.
In 1986 I watched a UK TV documentary called "Monkey Business".
(Channel 4 if I remember rightly and definitely not the BBC).
It showed the links between AIDS and the US military.
It occurs to me that for anyone else to have seen it and grasped the meaning it clearly conveyed they had to be, let's say, at least around thirteen years old. Anyone under about 33 years old probably isn't even aware that the documentary ever existed.
I've been listening to Alex Jones and visiting his web site quite often during the past few weeks and I was actually listening when someone rang up to wish him a happy birthday, his 33rd.
Joining a few things together, I thought maybe it is worth just mentioning about "Monkey Business" because it seems, if you can find it anywhere, it is revelatory in two ways. First is the content itself. Second is that twenty years later, well, knowing what that content means actually doesn't count for much.
Fifteen years later we all witness on our televisions the shock and awe of the 9-11 atrocity.
This too is swallowed, hook line and sinker.
So, what's next in line for us all, one way or another, that will hardly come as a surprise?
Yesterday's blog entry was just something I wanted to record while the thought stuck in my head.
The important thing is this: it doesn't really matter how they managed the planes, whether they were planes or something else, if they were full of passengers or empty and so on. Of course it matters if there were passengers killed but that's not what I mean. What I mean is that either the whole 9-11 event was a stage managed trick or not.
There is just too much evidence to conclude that it was not a huge trick. To conclude that it was not a trick, not an Inside Job, you must ignore or dismiss ALL of the strong evidence and proof that it was.
Once you have grasped that it must have an Inside Job then the rest is just detail that makes no difference whether you get it right or you get it totally wrong. You don't have to know how the magic 'saw-the-lady-in-half' trick is done to know that it is a trick.
It is far more important to think about what it means, this terrible and insane trick.
So don't get too bogged down in details that just don't matter except to the legal system if ever it comes to that which I doubt it ever will.
Don't fall into the trap of dismissing the 9-11 reality as irrational just because you see a flaw in one aspect of the explanation.
The missile that punched it's way through brick wall after brick wall of the Pentagon did not, as is sometimes said, go through much if any reinforced concrete. That doesn't matter. A missile punch like that is pretty self evident without it mattering much what the walls were made of - it's a detail but it's not crucial to deciding if it was a missile or as Popular Mechanics claimed, the undercarriage of a plane though I am a bit puzzled why they didn't say it was one of the two engines.
In searching for the truth don't be misled for too long by almost meaningless errors, distractions and misunderstandings and the like.
Concentrate instead on deciding for yourself if it was an Inside Job and then when you have made up your own mind based on your own thinking then try to work out what it means and my own pointer to what is important is not the New York atrocity but the Pentagon missile because that is very revealing. Once you grasp that meaning then you will realise just why they have gone to so much trouble to hide the fact that it was a missile.
In short it means that a faction of the US military launched it. The twin towers and the others were obviously all part of the same big scheme. So it can only have been this faction behind it ALL.
When you grasp that then you have to ask yourself what did it mean, why did they do it, what was it all for and so on.
The last fairly obvious but yet to be 'penny dropped' is the meaning for the President.
Did he know? Didn't he know?
Work it out for yourself. It is not difficult to fathom.
.
I get the impression that people are puzzled about what happened to the planes that had passengers if these were not crashed one way or another on 9-11. The planes were under loaded, fewer passengers on them than is normal - that's partly my guess and partly not but those passengers would have been solely people who could be counted on not to talk about their role that day. All they had to do was board a plane and fly to a destination where there was probably a reception party for them - a kind of celebration. That takes care of passengers that some say need to be dumped into the sea along with the plane and the plane is just a clever bit of switching. None of this is really difficult to plan or pull off. That done the other side is the actual flying objects, whatever they were, planes, maybe, of some kind. But another important and overlooked point is that the strike points could not be trusted to luck as every part of the plan would fail if that failed. The only way to ensure that is with well practised remote controlled flights. We assume that these planes were what they looked like but it is not difficult to knock up a huge model, moreover such a huge model could be very light and have almost no substance to it. When you keep looking at those plane strikes that hit the two towers that is a thing that keeps coming back to me that these are not real planes but are very light weight models. This is just a pet idea that keeps sitting at my feet so sooner or later it is going to get kicked out so it can go for a walk on it's own.
Couple more articles added. Click on articles to see and save me re typing. Both are about the missile strike on the Pentagon. One is a 10 point list of what it means, what we can deduce from that incident. The second is what has taken place military-wise since then and how it all makes sense.
Yesterday I discovered an extract form "Deserter's Tale" on a Canadian web site and I reproduce it here (link is lower down) and acknowledge the sources there too. I probably wouldn't bother reproducing anyone else's work like this except for one thing only and that is that I think it is just too important to ignore. After producing my own web page about this story and my thoughts on it I then, a bit late admittedly, checked to see where else it was being web reported and thankfully it isn't being swept under the carpet as there are plenty of other web sites discussing this man's story.
It is one thing when a very nasty crime is perpetrated by vicious and brutal thugs in some insane frenzy that is not known about by their senior officers. It is another thing altogether when the evidence clearly shows that those senior officers are not only in on it but are behind it.
Such accounts as these, and this is not the first very worrying revelation to come out of Iraq, are strong signals that should be treated with extreme urgency and serious attention by those who actually care. This is not something to ignore.
Here's the story and my observations: Deserter's Tale
The web pages are now created and re-created each time I update the site and I tend to edit and improve pages along the way so it's worthwhile to do a re-take on any particular issue I may have written about earlier. Since my last entry I have written a few more articles and re-done the home page yet again. Check the 'Articles' link for the additions.
Although this is a blog I don't plan to have comments and links to other blogs, instead I will steadily notifiy people, always I think it will be individuals rather than anything bigger, to let them know about my existence and what I am currently 'about' and the way I figure this is that as soon as I have contributed a couple of worthwhile items then maybe, just maybe, those individuals will decide to give me a mention in their blogs. Then I hope at some stage to maybe have a separate page that is devoted to more than just links which will be a page to refer to for blogs that I think are worthwhile to checkout for yourself. That's the plan.
Just added a new article I wrote this morning called Chain Reaction which includes the kind of humour you will get used to in my writing, a sort of tongue in cheek slant on something that I am really trying to be serious about but at the same time can't help injecting this kind of thing. This is easier to read and fathom for yourself than it is for me to dwell on it. Besides the topic itself even without the humourous additions I think is a nice easy one for stirring up all sorts of philosophical ideas and then some.
So, I present you with Chain Reaction for your enjoyment.
There is a group of respectable people that I regard as right minded and conscientious and so I made contact to see if we could work together towards helping people see the truth, that 9-11 was an Inside Job which is the only conspiracy theory that makes any sense.
For many people it seems an insane idea to have any other conspiracy theory other than the official one - but the official one is full of Reasons To Be Suspicious of it which is why I changed to the only conspriracy theory that makes complete sense according to all the evidence that any of us is able to collect and examine.
Anyway the email exchange is here.
My first article has just been uploaded, about 9-11,
91177
There are plenty of web sites that offer excellent evidence as Reasons To Be Seriously Suspicious of the official line or "The Story" and I don't want to simply repeat what others are bravely and clearly explaining but rather to touch on other aspects of this atrocity and it's continuing aftermath. If you are like me then when you switch from The Story to Inside Job you will find yourself in an hour of one of your days when you begin to weep at the awful meaning of it, of what it is really all about...
(more)
Saturday 3rd March 2007
The revelation a few days ago that the BBC announced some twenty minutes before it actually happened, that WTC7 had collapsed has been the issue of the moment among those like myself who have come to the certainty that 9/11 was an "Inside Job".
I get the impression that people think the BBC itself is to blame, that they gave false news or premature news purposely.
If that were the case then we could all breathe a sigh of relief that it is just a corrupt organisation that has been exposed. I wish that were the limit of it. The reality is surely more sinister, far more sinister. If not then what is the explanation that would satisfy our rightly suspicious minds? The BBC says it has lost it's several recordings of the event and my own attempts to locate it on the internet revealed obstructions had been suddenly put in place to prevent anyone from seeing those minutes of airtime again. But the censors weren't quick enough and like thousands of others I have my copy which I am in the process of duplicating on to CD for shipping off to interested people.
Now what could the reasonable explanation be for going to that trouble to prevent anyone from seeing that recording for themselves? It is evidence if not proof of what I am about to describe here.
The fact, it seems to me, is that the BBC has it's information lines and I use the term 'lines' in it's very broadest sense, seized and secretly controlled by others. This episode is evidence for that.
But, the response from the BBC includes claims that they do proper journalistic checking. I don't think that can be true whether they are the guilty party alone or just inept puppets, for want of a better term, of those who controlled that "information feed", that "line". If the BBC really checked it's sources then journalists, or at least these studios, would establish confidential, independent, sources that function alongside the "live feeds".
My conclusion bearing in mind I need no convincing that all the WTC buildings were destroyed as part of an Inside Job, is that those who did it also have that kind of control, to intercept, reduce, change or add to and control the flow of information that is given out to the BBC.
And, I should add, that is probably all done more or less completely obliviously to anyone at the BBC. So when they say it was just an error they actually don't have any idea of the kind of error it probably actually was: an error within the secret controlling centre, the same overall controlling center that masterminded the evil show that played out before all of our eyes more or less as it seemed to happen. Isn't it obvious that the BBC was fed the information, a "press release", early, in error. That "press release" even included the reason that it fell! Imagine, knowing the cause not just the fact of WTC7's collapse! Now who exactly would want to make clear the cause of it's collapse if it wasn't those responsible for bringing it down? It fell, we were all told, again long before it fell, due to weakening because of it's proximity to the twin towers. Isn't it obvious that those who perpetrated the whole 9-11 atrocity were also, at the same time, stage-managing the news of it to the whole world?
How much of the 9-11 news was similarly fraudulent? How much of the "planes" was real planes and how much was Computer Graphics software work fed into the news pipelines. There is evidence to show this is what happened. For instance, to point out a couple of things I think no one else has actually said, there is the group of people hugging the broken steel columns at the gash where the planes flew into one of the twin towers. So the steel wasn't too hot to touch and the area was not as we might otherwise have imagined, extremely hot and too hot for humans to stand around. The other video frame I have in mind is just, conveniently, before we would see a plane strike. The video cuts, but a couple of frames, examined closely look as if the plane is not a real part of that video. It shows signs of software manipulation. Maybe that's just my mistake but it doesn't much matter. There is plenty, absolutely plenty of solid evidence, incontrovertible evidence, that should make each one of us certain that "The Story", the official line of 9/11, was absurd, IS absurd, and that "Inside Job" are the two words that accurately sum up the whole evil.
Thursday, 1st March 2007
Welcome to Sane Thinking. My focus here is to write about important matters that others seem to have missed which, in my opinion, ought to receive a lot more attention. It is unlikely that I will name anyone such as whatever president or prime minister is in power or seems to be in power. In fact, it seems to me more and more in recent years, that political leaders at least in the West may have leadership power but at the same time there are others less identifiable who seem to be wielding greater power behind the scenes. 9/11 and 7/7 indicate to me that this is the case and I will be writing about why I think this here in the coming weeks. So keep an eye on SaneThinking.com whenever you have a few minutes to spare. Thanks for your visit.
Paul E. Coughlin, SaneThinking.com
1st March 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
