911 and 77 (21)
I came to the '9/11 was an inside job' realization a bit late in the day, just a couple of months ago in fact, but then it was quick and I went from assuming "The Story", the official explanation was true, to realizing that it was all totally and evily an Inside Job and now having got pretty much up to speed I see three basic camps.
One is the steel and thermite believers, a second is the energy beam people and a third is the Pentagon missile camp and there may be more I have forgotten or not yet come across.
Just to be clear where I stand, I belong to all three, by which I mean that I ascribe to all three of these very important schools of thought although I don't belong to any of these or any other groups, if it is right to call them groups at all, as such. All three of these basic 9/11 ideas have solid evidence, sufficient and much more, to conclude that these totally bizzarre, completely incredible and totally unbelieveable ideas are absolutely true beyond all shadow of doubt.
But how much of it matters, who cares any way and what difference does any of it make?
These and many other questions I put to myself time and time again as I try to fall asleep and the hours it sometimes takes in not doing exactly that, in not falling asleep because my mind sticks with it restlessly. These are not my preferred bed-time companions, these horrendous ideas but I am well balanced enough to handle them coolly, calmly and dispassionately - mainly because what's the point, what gets achieved, by getting 'all worked up', distressed or depressed about it.
All the evidence that says 9/11 was an inside job is of course important but it presumes that at some point thre will be some kind of investigation that merits the term investigation rather that the terms cover-up, pack-of-lies, white-wash, rubber-stamp and brush-aside. In more than five years little more has happened. So isn't it time to take a step back and look at the broader picture? It pays to do that from time to time and five years after the event has surely got to be just such a time.
There is a key fact, supposition if you prefer, not the thermite and not the energy beam (fascinating though that undoubtedly is) but the Pentagon missile.
The missile strike against the Pentagon reveals just about the whole unbelievable story whilst the other 9/11 horrors only lead to speculation and conclusions that even if rock solid true cannot be nearly so revealing as the missile strike can.
So please, if you dismissed it before at least assume it is true for the duration of my short article because we do not have the 'luxury' of being free to give any benefit of the doubt to the plane believers. I don't mean you do not have free choice; I mean that if you dismiss the missile idea as absurd then all that it means will never be understood.
It is so immensely important to understand what a missile strike means that we should assume it is true at least long enough to consider the implications and then, after that by all means dismiss the idea again and go back to focussing on what it means if all the WTC buildings were deliberately destroyed as part of an inside job. What meaning can be derived from that conclusion? How far can that get us on it's own? No, the missile is truely important and much more so that the twin or triple towers part of the scam.
So please, take it as fact for a moment. What does it mean if it was a missile? For a start, that it was all part of one huge scheme masterminded and perpetrated by Americans not foreigners.
It had to have been launched by a faction of the military and it had to have been meant as the result of an ultimatum that must have been issued to the president earlier which would have gone along the lines of "Do this or else and cooperate with us or else." It is hardly likely that even if a pilot could launch one independently that he would also more or less as part of a small renegade group have pulled off the rest of 9/11.
I am afraid to say we are talking about a coup d'etat. I hasten to add that I am not the first to say this. The president looked powerless as he sat in that schoolroom and I would bet if he had prior knowledge then the last place he would want to be is sitting in front of cameras. I don't think, therefore, that he knew beforehand. And afterwards? Well, what choice does he really have and what would be gained by telling the country everything? But maybe that will yet happen.
A military faction of the US took over the reins of government that day. It would have been that or face umpteen more such missiles strikes. Who knows where, the Pentagon hit a second time, the White House hit, New York. What is the president going to say? What is he going to do? He would have had no real choice but to acquiesce to their demands and pretend to the world and especially the American people that all is well.
It is astonishing that this scenario, a nightmare one, could not have been considered sufficiently seriously beforehand to prevent it from ever taking place, that insufficient safeguards were in place to stop or obstruct or limit it.
And since it has taken place and since provision for it's possibility as a strong threat has obviously never been adequately appreciated or prepared for, then it must also be assumed that the sophisticated security mechanisms designed to prevent any such rogue government - and that must surely be what it now it - from having the keys and codes to the nuclear weapons arsenal and the complete and latest range of WMDs, have either been bypassed or defeated.
It must also be the case that if a non-expert such as I, when it comes to such military and political matters which I suppose this is, can work this much out more or less then it is not credible to think that any government with any kind of intelligence service can be oblivious to any of this. All western governments must surely be aware of what has been going on. Despite knowing that the USA must now be in the hands of a quasi military regime with a puppet president they have all gone along with the phoney war on terror, the false terrorists from abroad and all of the criminal invasion, bombing and destruction done as a result of it in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Thus it is that the missile attack upon the Pentagon is far more important in gaining an understanding of what 9/11 was all about, more important than the hows and whys of the WTC atrocities.
Paul E Coughlin
SaneThinking.com
30th March 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
