911 and 77 (21)
Be in no doubt at all that the twin tower atrocity - actually it was more of a triple tower atrocity, in New York in 2001 and it's copycat cousin, London's 2005 bombings, had the same mentality and the same intention and the same modus operandi behind them.
They were both inside jobs by which I mean they were an insane scheme planned and perpetrated by agencies inside or closely linked to their respective governments and I do not believe that the intelligence is so poor that the realization of this has escaped the governmental leaders of the US and the UK or indeed those of the western world, any of these who might not be complicit from the outset.
I do not say that they were all necessarily complicit to start off with but that they could not have been unaware of the truth behind these atrocities within about ten days or less from when they were perpetrated, so the collusion is now widespread.
I find it hard to believe too, that other intelligence agencies, those of Japan, Korea (north and south), Australia, Pakistan, India, China, Russia, each European country, Iran and many others too, are totally in the dark about what actually occurred. It is their job after all to study and understand the truth behind such momentous atrocities.
And just as a little thought that suddenly popped into my head, it may well be what the recent Chinese missile strike upon a "redundant" satellite was really all about, as if to say: "Don't mess with us or we will start knocking down your crucial military satellites" and bearing in mind that a missile launch is expensive and no unused satellite ever needs to be 'killed'.
Some people suspect that this Chinese announced missile strike was against one of the American satellites. Either way it sends a little message to the US and the UK and the rest of Europe that their satellites are vulnerable to a quick and unstoppable attack.
So when you read on just bear in mind that this insane scheme that I am describing in this article is not inevitable and none of us is really powerless in all of this and if we think we are then that is our own choice to disempower ourselves not an outside disempowerment.
No special access to secret intelligence is necessary in order to see at least the most important aspects if not always the precise but less important detail.
In my opinion it does not take any special ability to discern all of this for oneself. Both the information and what it means is abundantly available to anyone with access to the Internet.
What does make a difference is not the need to know but the want to know . Most people don't want to know, they don't actually want to know the truth behind 911 and 77.
Why is that?
Probably because of what it means. It means for a start that a criminal mentality has swept powerfully through the running of our own countries. And knowing that, what can anyone do about it?
It is far more comfortable to ignore it than to face it.
This may be the first time in history that a huge, monstrous, and evil conspiracy is there for everyone to see if they choose to see it. Previously the majority of people would not have been able to see it, until it was too late to make any differnce, because the information would have been totally controlled.
In fact most conventional sources of information are now that controlled and, again, the evidence indicates it to be the case.
I can only assume, using only reason and critical observation, that the Internet will be next and I can see how that can be done quite easily.
But at the present time the Internet is the only source of that information. Well, no, not the only source. There are a few US radio stations and some brave and thinking people speaking sanely and importantly about this. And in each small community around the world I am sure there must be someone who, like me, is quietly working out what is happening. So I must correct myself: there is the internet and there are individuals. But as for the 'media' generally, I must warn you that whether it is fully controlled or entirely infiltrated makes little difference, it is definitely behaving as if that were the case.
If that were not the case then we would all be encouraged to consider simple and easy information to make us think about what really happened. There is plenty of such information. That information is not difficult to understand. Let me give you one example, it is just my own, I didn't discover it anywhere else. This example is one of dozens and I cite it because I have not seen it anywhere else and it does not rely on opinion or uncertain evidence.
It was not possible for aeroplanes to enter the twin towers as was clearly shown to the world.
How can I be sure?
Because I have watched the film showing the construction of those towers and that film is easy to find on the Internet so anyone can watch it too as long as they can get access to the Internet.
The tubular steel columns that formed the outer wall could not have been broken by any aeroplane.
Aeroplanes have to be made of lightweight material.
No lightweight material could possibly sever those columns.
So what we all saw was impossible. We were tricked. That is obvious and unambiguous.
I am not talking about aeroplane engines - whether they can or cannot sever such columns is secondary.
The wings and fuselage could not have cut through those steel columns and engines could not have dragged them through.
The realization of this very simple fact does not depend on any other information whatsoever.
Anyone making this step, this leap in awareness, is bound to be interested to find out more and that more, lots more, is there for the finding too.
So it is just ironic that there is no shortage of the necessary information to make us realize that the 911 atrocity must have been a well orchestrated inside job and at the same time very few people are bothered enough to actually find out for themselves the truth of the matter.
Once you do discover this then one next step is to realize that the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq were based on an evil trick, 911, and that deliberate lies about phantom terrorists has been turned into a whole scheme in itself, based on 9-11 and, in the UK, 7-7, to seemingly justify those criminal, worse than war, atrocities which are ongoing.
None of this is really my opinion. It is all very easy to verify for yourself. In my easy example all you need is the evidence for the strength of the towers which is in the films of their construction, the evidence of how aeroplanes are constructed and then the evidence that you yourself state when you see such aeroplanes apparently cut through such steel columns.
Trickery was used to deceive us, to deceive you. That is the only reasonable conclusion that you can come to once you have obtained that evidence and you have ascertained for yourself what it absolutely must mean.
You can do that on your own without any further hints or help from me or anyone else.
So the bottom line for me is this: why should I devote so much of my thinking day to this evil - and it has been my obsession for nearly three months now?
And my answer to my own question is that I will cease to focus on this problem as the raison d'etre for this web site and instead I will return my focus on SaneThinking on a broader scale. What this will mean in the coming days and weeks is that I will create a 911 and 77 section where I will park my articles on the subject for anyone who is interested in what I have to say to find and read, but it will no longer be the focus of my home page and this web site as it is at present.
You see, the media is complicit and the UK police are complicit. Various secret government agencies are complicit and the same for at least a huge chunk of the military. And government, as I said before, cannot be oblivious even if it just happened to be at the outset.
Most 911 truthers simply ask for a proper investigation but that assumes what is evidently not possible, that those who would run such an investigation are interested in the truth coming out and they cannot be.
Asking for an investigation is therefore, at most, only ever going to result in an investigation pantomime.
So what actually can be done?
This, to my mind, is like a sophisticated version of the run up to WWII, the second world war, evil things are happening, all the signs are present but most people don't want to know.
But, to repeat, what can anyone do about it anyway? You know what, I think just learning the truth and what it means is actually the first thing that you should do and later on ask yourself that question again. Each step simple though it is, is not easy. It is not easy to realize what it means that these homemade atrocities which injured and killed people were deliberately planned and perpetrated by "our own side" against our own people. That realization and acceptance is actually quite a big step and quite a feat in itself.
Those who did this also must know that there will come a point when the public is no longer fooled and at that time it will be too late and the Homeland Security - why else bother creating it - will sweep into action, as a new police or military force, on a bigger scale. The infrastructure of prisons and concentration camps with railways and rail carriages for shackled prisoners will all be put into action. This is not a wild imagining because others have recorded the activities that show or prove that this is what is being prepared for. There is also a strong possibility and I put it like that because I can see how it can be done quite easily and I note that the PNAC plan includes this intention, that the Internet will be put under state control.
If they do this in the way that I think they will then all Internet traffic that is non military can be dropped at key routers. Second worst is that they only allow military and government traffic. Either way all else will just be dropped when it reaches a key Internet router.
IF they do that and they will have to in order to stop any kind of resistance network communications via the Internet, then phones, faxes, emails, web sites, chat, newsgroups and everything else that relies on an Internet packet will cease to work, none of it will reach it's destination. Businesses that rely on the Internet - and most do nowadays - will go bust or have serious problems. Will phones really cease to work? I was told in the early nineties that even local phone calls in the UK are routed via satellite. Some phone calls may still work but the systems that remain useable will probably become overloaded which is to say that they will either be unusable or seriously disrupted.
Satellite communications are military controlled separately anyway so while the Internet can be controlled quite easily to limit it to military or military and government, satellite communications will almost certainly have some kind of military override but this is speculation on my part, I don't make any assertions, just state it as a probability that will run alongside total Internet control.
So if business collapses and big business is part of the military industrial complex behind this mad scheme then surely they would not go that far? If it comes to a contest or disagreement between government and military then military makes a strike like the missile that hit the Pentagon - that is why that event is important - and likewise if the military and the big money men fall out then it is the military that will call the shots.
It is probably the case now that an uprising by the public is not altogether a good idea - it could trigger this part of the plan into action. In any case I am not competent to make any kind of suggestions about what to do beyond finding out and making sure you understand and not getting drawn into any side issues that may or may not be true.
This is all about information and intelligence and making your own self aware. Right now you have both but that information, I can tell you this too, is being removed from the Internet, in some cases within minutes of it being uploaded.
The second thing you can do is share with just a few people you know if you know someone that you trust enough to be able to tell - in my life this list is exhausted. I have no 'circle' to inform and the few people I have pleaded with to learn about this have either ignored me or laughed at my outrageous suggestions.
For me then it is very ironic that I should have learned so much so quickly (albeit it very late in the day) and not really be able to share it with anyone.
Well, that is except for this web site of mine and who knows, maybe, just maybe, it will serve to bring people onboard with me.
I mentioned the PNAC plan and I won't do more than say do a google on it because it must be well covered in loads of places. It may shock you to see that what is happening is almost 'predicted' in it.
The conviction that 911 and 77 are linked inside jobs is not one that I came to lightly. I saw enough, more than enough, using just the Internet and not the usual 'media', to come to this rock solid conclusion. At some stage I may share my reasons with you but the way I see it, if you are really interested then you can find out just as easily as I did so what point would there be in my going to all that trouble.
The new US force, Homeland Security, doesn't have an equivalent in the UK but looking at how the police in London have all kept silent - no whistleblowers, no leaked information - and have fully cooperated in the lies, deception, injuries and, well, cold-blooded murders of innocent people, it has to be concluded that they to have joined in this huge criminal conspiracy. That does not surprise me. But it means that they at least will have no compunction in rounding up people in the same way that all the signs suggest will happen in the US.
That said, I am aware that most people don't want to spend hours and hours researching this as they have other more interesting things to do. And I too learned what I learned because others have gone to the trouble of sharing some of what they know and explaining it.
So I do plan to explain my reasons in the coming days and weeks. But I want to emphasize this, I don't have any information that is not already easy to find on the Internet yourself. Also, I probably have no greater ability to make proper sense and draw proper conclusions about it than you do yourself, assuming you are not a child that actually, obviously, does need adult help with such things but in that case you should really be asking an adult or older person you trust to explain things to you.
What is the point of all this insanity and why now?
Some people say "Peak Oil" others say it is all about world domination by the USA. If it is peak oil then there is an astonishing irony again because for decades - again the Internet can show you this - inventor after inventor has discovered that it is not only possible to get free energy in abundance but that it is unlimited and has no pollution. Imagine, these people have been killed, silenced, legislatively disabled, suicided, poisoned and all to maintain the oil need, the oil money need.
Isn't that just crazy?
I think the oil part is real but like the rest, find out and judge for yourself. I think the global political picture is also simultaneously real too. Either way, it will probably backfire at some stage, such insane scheming always does. China, Russian, North Korea, India, Pakistan are hardly likely to sit back and do nothing about the USA and the UK taking over effective ownership of the Middle East.
Paul E. Coughlin, 19th March 2007
![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
